There is some, to me at least, mind boggling double talk in this article
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aU.evtnk6DPo&refer=worldwide
Some choice quotes:
"`Those natural climate [cooling] variations could be stronger than the
global-warming trend over the next 10-year period,'' Wood said in
an interview. ``Without knowing that, you might erroneously think
there's no global warming going on.'"
"'If we don't experience warming over the next 10 years, it
doesn't mean that greenhouse-gas warming is not with us,''
Keenlyside said in an interview. ``There can be natural
fluctuations that may mask climate change in the short term.'"
Maybe the quotes were taken out of context in the article. If not, these quotes smack of cultish thinking where one's brain is conditioned to believe that two directly opposite things can be true at the same time. To me I'm reading this as that he's saying "If we cool over the next 10 years, but impose current trends on top of it, you'll see that we should have cooled even more and therefore it's still warming." It's almost like he's saying if the average temperate is 40c in 2015, it's really 50c adjusted for global warming. He also says that if you run the current model long enough, we'll come out of the cold spell even warmer. I wonder if the model takes the future cooling trends into effect.
I guess it's possible, but it seems like a stretch. Only time will tell. Please don't take this as me saying that all "global warming" or climate change is a hoax. I do think however that is our duty to be discerning when reading things on this subject as it's controversial.