George,
I think you kinda hit the nail on the head w/ the amount of money
you'd need to charge for your bands performances.
Right. If each guy is getting say $500 a week (regardless of the number of gigs) and you have 4 hired guns, that's 2Gs right there.
I think it would be
easy for Folkerts or myself for example to hire people to play and
learn any and all songs required of them if there was going to be a
steady paycheck. you know, "hey man, i can guarantee you five hundred
dollars for one night of performing."
True. Money talks and people listen.
if that kind of money was at stake more people would be willing to put more time into rehearsing during the week.
True, but then you are also talking a different level of musician as well. People getting those kind of gigs play (or played) in bands that warranted it.
if you played once a week and payed each "hired gun" five hundred a week, hell that's almost more than i make having a day job
ehhh kinda. Remember, that's not $500 NET, that's GROSS. As a independant contractor, you pay 15% FICA instead of 7.5%, but you can do some things as write-offs. So whether you make more money doing that then a dayjob all kind of depends.
the problem becomes what happens when you are trying to do this on a much smaller budget
True.
ps
i'm totally not trying to make this a ten page thread on money vs. art
and all that bullshit we've all heard everyone's theories on that
before